When hiring an Amazon agency, choosing the right pricing model can be the difference between a thriving partnership and a frustrating experience.
At Five Star Commerce, we’ve worked with hundreds of brands and evaluated many agency-client relationships. Below is a breakdown of the most common pricing models—hourly, monthly flat fee, flat-fee mini projects, and percentage of sales—along with real-world insights to help you choose what’s right for your situation.
1. Hourly Billing
How it works:
You’re charged for the actual hours worked—whether that’s strategy calls, listing optimization, PPC management, reporting, or email support. You agree on fair billable rates and often a monthly budget. Invoices typically include time logs and detailed descriptions of the work performed.
✅ Pros
- Transparent and fair: You’re only paying for the time actually spent on your brand, with clear breakdowns showing where your money is going.
- Scalable with need: You can easily scale up support during launches or key campaigns and scale down during low-activity periods (e.g., stockouts or seasonality).
- Aligned incentives: Agencies are motivated to perform well and retain your business long-term. It’s similar to paying an employee—you’re compensating them for their work and expertise, not a cut of your sales.
- Customizable services: You can request specific help—like keyword research, image consultation, or compliance troubleshooting—and get billed only for that.
- Encourages collaboration: You can choose to stay hands-on or gradually delegate over time, leading to more efficient workflows.
❌ Cons
- Variable billing: Your monthly bill may fluctuate depending on activity levels. This can be managed by setting a spending cap that the agency won’t exceed without approval.
- Learning curve for new clients: If you’ve never worked with contractors or agencies before, it can feel unusual to see billed time for calls, emails, or background research—even though that same time is typically embedded (but hidden) in flat fees.
💡 Real Example
A dietary supplement brand once had its entire Amazon account suspended after an algorithm error. It took over a month to get reinstated using a specialized suspension service. Because they paid their main agency hourly, they could pause services without wasting budget. A flat monthly fee would’ve meant paying full price during a month when no value could be delivered.
2. Monthly Flat Fee (Retainer)
How it works:
You pay a fixed monthly rate for ongoing services—usually including creative work, SEO, PPC management, and strategic guidance. This is a very common model for full account management or advertising retainers.
✅ Pros
- Predictable budgeting: Consistent costs make financial planning easier.
- Defined scope: Deliverables are usually clear, with standard services agreed upon upfront.
- Convenient for hands-off clients: Ideal for those who prefer an agency to manage most tasks independently.
❌ Cons
- Paying for downtime: Project delays (Amazon approvals, manufacturing, inventory issues) can leave you paying during inactive months.
- Reduced individual focus: Some brands report that this model can result in less individualized attention—especially when agencies manage many clients simultaneously.
- Over-automation risks: Many flat-fee agencies rely heavily on software to streamline processes. Without enough human oversight, automated actions can overlook important issues.
- More work upfront, less later: The workload for a brand often peaks during setup or launch, then decreases in later months. However, many retainers don’t reduce costs after the initial phase.
- End-of-contract lag: When canceling, most agencies require 30–60 days’ notice. After giving notice, some slow their effort while still billing, effectively charging for a “wind-down” period.
- Inflexible systems: Standardized processes may not fit your brand’s specific needs. For example, one kitchenware brand worked with a retainer-based agency that refused to adapt their rigid playbook. After switching to an hourly model with Five Star Commerce, they received a tailored strategy that helped them scale successfully and eventually sell the business.
- Flat-fee opacity: Flat-fee models can sometimes obscure how little active work is being done on an account.
💡 Real Example
A snack brand delayed its Amazon launch because of manufacturing issues. The agency had already completed pre-launch work, but the client still had to pay the full retainer for the following month when little was needed. Under an hourly arrangement, they could have paused or reduced costs during that period.
3. Flat-Fee Mini Projects
How it works:
You pay a set price for a specific deliverable (e.g., optimizing 5 listings, refreshing a storefront, or creating A+ Content). This is common on platforms such as Fiverr.
✅ Pros
- Upfront cost clarity: You know exactly what you’re paying for.
- No ongoing commitment: Great for short-term tasks or testing new services.
- Fast deliverables: Often include set timelines and completion guarantees.
- Efficient for hands-on brands: Perfect if you already manage your Amazon presence and just need help with specific items.
❌ Cons
- Limited strategy: Agencies expect you to define the task, so there’s less strategic guidance.
- More client involvement: You may need to gather product details, competitor data, or brand assets yourself.
- Fragmented execution: Mini projects may not align with a cohesive growth strategy.
- Little follow-up: Agencies aren’t typically responsible for measuring long-term impact after delivery.
- Restricted communication: On platforms like Fiverr, contact is often limited to in-platform messaging unless you pay for extended communication.
- Transparency concerns: Some project-based models rely on outsourced or low-cost production teams, which can affect consistency and communication quality.
- No implementation support: For example, if you purchase A+ Content design, you may still need to upload and troubleshoot approvals yourself. What appears cheaper may simply reflect a smaller service scope.
- Automation overlap: Simple design or keyword tasks may now be replicable using AI tools like ChatGPT—sometimes at lower cost.
🎨 Example: Fiverr-Style Project Platforms
On marketplaces such as Fiverr or Upwork, clients typically select a pre-set package and fill out forms with required details. While pricing may seem low initially, add-ons for revisions, faster delivery, or consultation can raise the total cost. Communication is often limited to the platform, and the person listed may outsource the work to others without your knowledge. It doesn’t offer the “white glove” type of experience many companies need.
4. Percentage of Sales (Commission-Based)
How it works:
The agency takes a percentage of your Amazon sales, sometimes with a minimum base fee.
✅ Pros
- Performance-aligned (in theory): The agency earns more when you grow.
- Low upfront cost: May appeal to early-stage brands with minimal budgets.
❌ Cons
- Uncommon today: This model has become uncommon in the agency world, as it often proves difficult to sustain profitably for either side.
- Selective client acceptance: Agencies typically prefer brands with existing traction to reduce risk.
- Overpayment risk: As your brand scales, you may end up paying disproportionately more for the same amount of work.
- Attribution disputes: It’s often hard to determine whether sales came from agency actions or other channels.
- Difficult to exit: Long contracts and revenue-sharing clauses can lock brands into relationships that are no longer beneficial.
- “You make money or you don’t pay” caveats: Some promotions sound risk-free but often involve high rates or restrictive definitions of “success.”
🧮 Comparison Table
|
Model |
Best For |
💲 Predictability |
🔄 Flexibility |
🧠 Strategic Depth |
⚠️ Risk Level |
|
⏱️ Hourly Billing |
Growing or evolving brands. Large brands that want to constantly be growing. |
Medium |
High |
High |
⚠️ |
|
💼 Monthly Flat Fee |
Established brands with precise stable needs |
High |
Medium |
Medium |
⚠️⚠️ |
|
🧾 Flat-Fee Projects |
Short-term or one-time needs |
High |
Low |
Low |
⚠️⚠️ |
|
📈 % of Sales |
Rare partnerships or startups |
Low |
Low |
Medium |
⚠️⚠️⚠️ |
Our Take
In our experience managing over 400 Amazon brands annually, we’ve observed that the hourly model tends to provide the clearest link between effort and results.
We’ve found the hourly approach to be the most transparent and scalable for the types of brands we serve.
However, every model has its place. Flat-fee retainers can suit established brands with consistent deliverables, and project-based models can work well for brands needing focused creative support.
The key is alignment and communication—ensuring the agency’s incentives match your goals and that reporting clearly shows what’s being done.